In it, Huxley tries to demonstrate with quotes from holy books that the various religions on Earth have much more in common than we tend to think вЂ“ and that they are much more similar to each other than they are different. That would be enough.ДЄnother of the greatest books of the 20th century, universally lauded since the moment Huxley published it, is вЂњThe Perennial PhilosophyвЂќ (1945). Just looking, just being the divine Not-self of flower, of book, of chair, of flannel. For if one always saw like this, one would never want to do anything else. вЂњThis is how one ought to see, how things really are.вЂќ And yet there were reservations. вЂ¦ вЂњThis is how one ought to see,вЂќ I kept saying as I looked down at my trousers, or glanced at the jeweled books in the shelves, at the legs of my infinitely more than Van-Goghian chair. Those folds in the trousers - what a labyrinth of endlessly significant complexity! And the texture of the gray flannel - how rich, how deeply, mysteriously sumptuous! And here they were again, in BotticelliвЂ™s picture. вЂ¦ This was something I had seen before - seen that very morning, between the flowers and the furniture, when I looked down by chance, and went on passionately staring by choice, at my ownД¬rossed legs. I was seeing what Adam had seen on the morning of his creation - the miracle, moment by moment, of naked existence. I was not looking now at an unusual flower arrangement. At breakfast that morning I had been struck by the lively dissonance of its colors. Fortuitous and provisional, the little nosegay broke all the rules of traditional good taste. The vase contained only three flowers - a full-blown Belie of Portugal rose, shell pink with a hint at every petalвЂ™s base of a hotter, flamier hue a large magenta and cream-colored carnation and, pale purple at the end of its broken stalk, the bold heraldic blossom of an iris. An hour and a half later, I was sitting in my study, looking intently at a small glass vase. But In that book, Huxley describes the world, experienced through the drug, with the precision and the poetic instinct of a world-class writer: It is a small essay, only a few dozen pages, the description of an afternoon. He himself was a user of both LSD and mescaline, a drug made of a cactus growing in Mexico, and he described his experiences in one of the most remarkable non-fiction works of the 20th century: вЂњThe Doors of PerceptionвЂќ (1954), from which the music band вЂњThe DoorsвЂќ took their name. Huxley was an advocate of ritualised and controlled drug-use, not as recreation, but as a way to open up new, ecstatic states of mind that would allow вЂњnormalвЂќ people to experience what is otherwise reserved for monks and mystics. His most valuable books for the philosophically interested reader are not the novels at all. Huxley is often less interested in the plot and the character development of his protagonists, and more in the philosophical ideas that fill his books. In fact, his novels are sometimes only thinly veiled philosophical treatises. The most famous book of his is probably вЂњBrave New WorldвЂќ (1932), which has often been included in lists of the best novels of all time. Aldous Huxley and The Doors of PerceptionДЄldous Huxley (1894-1963) was a British writer and philosopher who wrote over fifty books during his lifetime, both novels and non-fiction. The author of Brave New World tried here to show a positive vision of how he thought that human beings should live and flourish вЂ“ but the darkness is never far behind, even in this paradise. The last book of visionary writer Aldous Huxley (1894-1963), Island, is a bold attempt to envision a utopian society that provides its members with everything they need to achieve happiness in life.

The island huxley